Management of Toxicity and Side Effects of Systemic Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
Standard approved systemic treatment options for the management of renal cancer have entirely transformed in the
last 15 years and now comprise molecularly targeted therapies against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
(VEGFR) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors. These agents
may be used alone as monotherapies but increasingly are used in various combinations. The associated important
improvements in cancer control and survival have therefore been accompanied by a range of new toxicities. Good
management of these toxicities is important for patient safety and quality of life, and also to optimize patients’
opportunity to continue with and therefore benefit from these therapies. The most common toxicities associated
with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are fatigue, skin rashes, gastrointestinal, stomatitis, hypertension and other
cardiovascular toxicities, and hematological and endocrine dysfunction. Common side effects of mTOR inhibitors
include asthenia, stomatitis, skin rashes, pneumonitis, metabolic changes and infections. Checkpoint inhibitors
can lead to toxicities of any organ system with those seen most frequently including dermatologic, gastrointestinal
and hepatic, endocrine, musculoskeletal, and pulmonary, whilst renal, hematological, ophthalmic, cardiac and
neurological toxicities are seen less often. In general terms, toxicity management should start preemptively with
patient education and may also include a combination of supportive approaches, dose reduction, schedule alteration,
treatment interruption and occasionally treatment cessation. Treatment of individual toxicities is dependent on the
likely causative agent and is guided by its grade or severity. Specific recommendations for management are discussed
in this chapter.
The Société International d'Urologie (SIU), which owns and publishes the Société International d'Urologie Journal (SIUJ), does not require authors of papers published in the journal to transfer copyright. Instead, we ask authors to grant an exclusive licence that allows us to publish the article in SIUJ (and any derivative or related products or publications) and that allows us to sub-license such rights and exploit all subsidiary rights.
Authors retain the right to use their own articles for their own non-commercial purposes without seeking explicit permission from SIU.
The SIUJ publication licence expressly defines “non-commercial” as “not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.” Although no activity is completely disconnected from commercial activity, the following are generally considered to be non-commercial uses:
- Reproduction of a reasonable number (no more than 100) of print copies of the published paper for personal use (e.g., sharing with colleagues, including in grant applications).
- Posting a copy of the published version of the paper on the author’s own or their institution’s website. The article must be accompanied by this statement: ‘This article has been published in the SIUJ: [full citation; link]’.
- Inclusion of the paper in a course pack, with a maximum of 100 copies to be used in the author’s institution. The copies must include the following acknowledgement: ‘This article has been published in the SIUJ: [full citation; link].’
As the distinction between commercial and non-commercial is not always clear, authors are strongly advised to seek permission from SIU for any use that may be considered to have a commercial aspect.
We ask the corresponding author to read the terms of the licence and then to grant this exclusive licence on behalf of all authors by indicating agreement to the following statement:
The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, an exclusive licence on a worldwide basis to the SIU and its licensees to permit this article (if accepted) to be published in the SIUJ and any other SIU products and publications and to exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in our licence agreement.
Review and Decision
Most submissions will be reviewed by a senior editor within 2 weeks. Many manuscripts will be rejected at this point for a variety of reasons, including subject matter outside the scope of the SIUJ, flawed design, discredited or outdated methodology, poor organization or presentation, failure to conform to ethical requirements, and apparent plagiarism.The remaining manuscripts will be sent for peer review. The SIUJ uses a single-blind process: reviewers know the identity of the authors, but the authors are not told who has reviewed their manuscript, and SIUJ ensures that potentially identifying information is removed from comments sent to them. Reviewers are asked to make their recommendations within 10 days, after which a senior/specialist editor will consider their comments and recommend provisional acceptance dependent on satisfactory revision, acceptance without revision, or rejection. Authors should receive a final decision within 4 to 6 weeks of submission.
